The brand new survey consisted of step three pieces. Area We provided issues out-of socio-group study (age, level of degree, parity, familial money, career, newest marital condition, sexual activity, reputation for HPV vaccination, and history of unusual cervical cancer tumors assessment).
Region II comprised of six questions regarding the mark women who are Letland Г¦gteskabsside processed, many years to start, frequency, age otherwise criteria to cease away from tests, and methods off testing. Only the professionals who had ever heard out-of HPV do just do it to help you Part III which reviewed information about HPV out-of its style of (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), function off indication and you may cures.
Prior to the analysis, the newest survey off region II and area III inside the Thai version were considered, discussed, and revised up to opinion among 20 researchers who were all of the gynecologic oncologists (some were people various other parallel knowledge). The experts rated every one of 19 concerns once the possibly ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-level Articles Authenticity Index (I-CVI) are computed each goods, therefore the Stuff Validity Directory (CVI) is computed by using the average ratio off fourteen questions regarding understanding of cervical disease assessment and you can 5 questions relating to HPV. The fresh new CVI was in fact step 1 both for parts of new questionnaire (S1 Table). This new precision is checked out inside the 29 feminine with the exact same trait just like the users. This new Cronbach’ leader coefficients into the accuracy have been 0.819 for information about cervical disease tests and you can 0.907 to have knowledge about HPV.
With the day out of arranged colposcopy, the analysis secretary provided information of the study into the feminine exactly who found inclusion requirements. The ladies which accessible to take part offered authored told consent and you may responded the fresh new questionnaire alone themselves just before proceeding to help you colposcopy.
Studies compiled for it study had been socio-group study (Part I of one’s questionnaire), expertise in cervical cancer screening (Area II), and you will experience in HPV (Part III).
Brand new solutions of real information in the cervical malignant tumors screening and you will HPV was indeed analyzed by for each and every items prior to scoring categorization. Right respond to is obtained since 1 whereas ‘wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ is obtained 0.
Of 14 issues regarding cervical disease assessment, female whose rating had been ? 10 was indeed arbitrarily categorized because which have ‘an excellent knowledge’ or else was in fact considered as with “not good training”. To possess experience in HPV, female whoever respond to are ‘never ever heard about HPV’ were excluded on data away from HPV knowledge.
Of 5 questions, women whoever score was basically ? step 3 have been considered as that have ‘an effective experience with HPV’ otherwise given that ‘not good knowledge’. Regarding 19 inquiries, female whose get had been ? thirteen was basically categorized since which have ‘good full knowledge’ usually just like the ‘bad complete knowledge’.
All the research was indeed accumulated in the an electronic database and you will analyzed using SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were utilized to research demographic analysis and you will was summarized as quantity having fee, indicate that have important deviation or average which have assortment. The new organization ranging from for every single adjustable and you may training get had been examined playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory model is made during the multivariable analysis plus all parameters possibly pertaining to the info rating. New felt quantity of statistical significance are a p-property value 0.05 or quicker.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>